SAT-Based Decision Procedure for Analytic Pure Sequent Calculi
نویسندگان
چکیده
We identify a wide family of analytic sequent calculi for propositional non-classical logics whose derivability problem can be uniformly reduced to SAT. The proposed reduction is based on interpreting these calculi using non-deterministic semantics. Its time complexity is polynomial, and, in fact, linear for a useful subfamily. We further study an extension of such calculi with Next operators, and show that this extension preserves analyticity and is subject to a similar reduction to SAT. A particular interesting instance of these results is a HORNSATbased linear-time decision procedure for Gurevich and Neeman’s primal infon logic and several natural extensions of it.
منابع مشابه
Gen2sat: An Automated Tool for Deciding Derivability in Analytic Pure Sequent Calculi
Gen2sat is an efficient and generic theorem prover that can decide derivability for a wide variety of propositional non-classical logics given in terms of a sequent system. It contributes to the line of research on computer-supported tools for investigation and construction of logics in the spirit of the “logic engineering” paradigm. Its generality and efficiency are made possible by encoding a...
متن کاملSimpliication with Renaming: a General Proof Technique for Tableau and Sequent-based Provers
Tableau and sequent calculi are the basis for most popular interactive theorem provers for hardware and software veri cation. Yet, when it comes to decision procedures or automatic proof search, tableaux are orders of magnitude slower than Davis-Putnam, SAT based procedures or other techniques based on resolution. To meet this challenge, this paper proposes a theoretical innovation: the rule of...
متن کاملOn the Construction of Analytic Sequent Calculi for Sub-classical Logics
Proof theory reveals a wide mosaic of possibilities for sub-classical logics. These are logics that are strictly contained (as consequence relations) in classical logic. Thus, by choosing a subset of axioms and derivation rules that are derivable in (some proof system for) classical logic, one easily obtains a (proof system for a) sub-classical logic. Various important and useful non-classical ...
متن کاملNested Sequent Calculi and Theorem Proving for Normal Conditional Logics
In this paper we focus on proof methods and theorem proving for normal conditional logics, by describing nested sequent calculi as well as a theorem prover for them. Nested sequent calculi are a useful generalization of ordinary sequent calculi, where sequents are allowed to occur within sequents. Nested sequent calculi have been profitably employed in the area of (multi)-modal logic to obtain ...
متن کاملSimplification: A General Constraint Propagation Technique for Propositional and Modal Tableaux
Tableau and sequent calculi are the basis for most popular interactive theorem provers for formal veriication. Yet, when it comes to automatic proof search, tableaux are often slower than Davis-Putnam, SAT procedures or other techniques. This is partly due to the absence of a bivalence principle (viz. the cut-rule) but there is another source of ineeciency: the lack of constraint propagation me...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014